Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: billbarstad Date: Apr 23, 2009 4:23pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: MORE TO COME

His registration for Cat-Women of the Moon is a year late (See picture 1), but the movie is properly registered (See picture 2).

Attachment: Picture_1.jpg
Attachment: Picture_2.jpg

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Video-Cellar Date: Apr 23, 2009 11:41pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: MORE TO COME

I am in the process of getting the movie ready for upload. The 28 years of copyright begins at the date in the film's copyright notice which is "MCMLIII" (1953) in this case. The regisration of copyright was proper and correct, but there needed to be a renewal registration lodged by 31 Dec 1981 for the copyright to continue, hence Williams' ommision of the 1953 "date of creation" and "in Notice" year from the renewal registration. Essentially the renewal registration was lodge 8 months after the film entered the public domain.

If WWC or Corinth Films send a takedown notice, I will consider suing them for copyfraud under the DMCA as my lasting legacy to the public domain.

This post was modified by Video-Cellar on 2009-04-24 06:41:48

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: billbarstad Date: Apr 24, 2009 5:56am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: MORE TO COME

I'm confused. Doesn't Z. M. Productions' registration of 4/23/81 matter? Is it because the registration refers to a videocassette? Anyway, it's great that you're going to post it and defend it, need be!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Video-Cellar Date: Apr 24, 2009 6:48am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: MORE TO COME

The ZM productions registration was a delayed initial registration. They didn't register the film in 1953 or 1954. Under the law, when a film was publishished with a valid copyright notice, it did not have to be registered with the copyright office to be protected, except to secure the extended term of copyright. Just having a notice protected the film for 28 years and registration was only necessary if you wanted to pursue copyright violators for damages. So, basically, a film could be registered for copyright any time up until and during the 28th year, but a renewal registration also had to be lodged by the end of the 28th year to secure the copyright for the extended term.

So, its a two step process for films published before 1964 with a notice but without a pre-publication registration. Firstly, there needed to be a registration filed before the end of the 28th year. Secondly, there needed to be a renewal registration filed before the end of the 28th year. ZM fulfilled step 1 but not step 2 and thus the film entered the public domain from 1 January 1982, eight months before Williams renewal lodgement.

Hope this explains it. It is not easy to get your head around the technicalities of registration and renewal.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: abisynthe Date: Nov 6, 2010 3:32am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: MORE TO COME

Quote: registration was only necessary if you wanted to pursue copyright violators for damages

That would be actual damages, no statute punitive damages. If I sue you for a kleenex, I will pay the lawyer fees to win one cent.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Video-Cellar Date: Nov 6, 2010 4:36am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: MORE TO COME

No, a timely registration was required to pursue statutory damages. It is still a feature of copyright law that in order to pursue federal statutory damages (and costs) a federal copyright registration must be filed. A copyright infringement case cannot be pursued without a registration because it acts as the only prima facie evidence of the copyright.

This post was modified by Video-Cellar on 2010-11-06 11:36:46

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: abisynthe Date: Nov 6, 2010 10:34am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: MORE TO COME

For works prior to 1989.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Video-Cellar Date: Nov 6, 2010 4:45pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: MORE TO COME

No, registration of US works and Non-Berne foreign works is still currently required to pursue court action in the US. Timely registration (before publication or within three months of publication) is required to access the full range of rights and remedies.

From Copyright Office Circ- 1 Copyright Basics (Revised Aug 2010) -

"Copyright Registration
In general, copyright registration is a legal formality intended to make a public record of the basic facts of a particular copyright. However, registration is not a condition of copyright protection. Even though registration is not a requirement for protection, the copyright law provides several inducements or advantages to encourage copyright owners to make registration.
Among these advantages are the following:
• Registration establishes a public record of the copyright claim.
• Before an infringement suit may be filed in court, registration is necessary for works of U. S. origin.
• If made before or within five years of publication, registration will establish prima facie evidence in court of the validity of the copyright and of the facts stated in the certificate.
• If registration is made within three months after publication of the work or prior to an infringement of the work, statutory damages and attorney’s fees will be available to the copyright owner in court actions. Otherwise, only an award of actual damages and profits is available to the copyright owner.
• Registration allows the owner of the copyright to record the registration with the U. S. Customs Service for protection against the importation of infringing copies. For additional information, go to the U. S. Customs and Border Protection website at www.cbp.gov/."

The full circular is available here

This post was modified by Video-Cellar on 2010-11-06 23:45:32

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: billbarstad Date: Apr 24, 2009 7:12am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: MORE TO COME

Thanks, it makes more sense now. I'm glad you're on-the-ball about these things, and a friend of the Archive!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: quigs Date: Apr 23, 2009 5:54pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: MORE TO COME

What a shame, if only to hear Elmer Berstein's score.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmicola Date: Apr 23, 2009 6:25pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: MORE TO COME

Back in the early 1980s, Varese Sarabande records had announced a planned album release of Elmer Bernstein's scores for CAT-WOMEN OF THE MOON and ROBOT MONSTER. Too bad it never happened!

Speaking of E.B., I knew a producer who made extremely low-budget films, including one that Bernstein scored in the early 50s. It was one of Bernstein's first films. I asked this producer how much he paid for the score, and he said $200. Maybe that gives you an idea how cheap the film itself was.